Hi All,
I came across this while surfing the security sites:
http://www.nabble.com/GIF-Spam----Setting-up-the-'OCR-scanner-and-image-validator-SA-plugin'-tf2042373.html
Maybe it’s possible to implement this feature in the InterWorx-CP.
Enabling/Disabling this on the NodeWorx level is a must if it’s implemented.
I believe that no other CP has this feature.
Greets,
R?mon
Meh, I’d like to see InterWorx integrate DSPAM. That would be pretty cool. I really like their slogan “Go Ahead, Send me Viagra” =]
[quote=WebXtrA;9476]Hi All,
I came across this while surfing the security sites:
http://www.nabble.com/GIF-Spam----Setting-up-the-'OCR-scanner-and-image-validator-SA-plugin'-tf2042373.html
Maybe it’s possible to implement this feature in the InterWorx-CP.
Enabling/Disabling this on the NodeWorx level is a must if it’s implemented.
I believe that no other CP has this feature.
Greets,
R?mon[/quote]
This is kinda neat – do people really get that much image filled spam?
Personally I don’t.
[quote=sliqua;9732]Meh, I’d like to see InterWorx integrate DSPAM. That would be pretty cool. I really like their slogan “Go Ahead, Send me Viagra” =]
http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/[/quote]
What does it do that Spam Assassin doesn’t?
Half the spam I get doesn’t even have any content… the rest are just from some weird email address with a dodgy subject, and are plain-text, so my local Bayesian spam filter picks it up easily.
It’s more effective than spamassassin from what I’ve experienced. =]
Can you be more specific than that, Alex? More effective in general “out of the box”? Easier to configure. I guess I’m asking for why (in detail) you think we should replace SA with this (having two antispam programs would probably be confusing).
Tim,
From my minor experience with it (I’m not running it on an iworx box, mind you) I’ve noticed a dramatic decrease in spam that is able to get through with little to no configuration. So yes, it could be safe to say that it works better than SpamAssassin out of the box.
Some time back, I have read on the net (should be somewhere on a forum/blog, don’t remember exactly) that dspam was better than spamassassin for them.
Another reason is: In the dspam site, it is mentioned that dspam is written in C. So, it should be faster than interpreted code.
If possible, you could give an option for the client (i.e., the server admin) to choose dspam or SA while installing iworx or at anytime.
[quote=tiger;9752]Another reason is: In the dspam site, it is mentioned that dspam is written in C. So, it should be faster than interpreted code.
If possible, you could give an option for the client (i.e., the server admin) to choose dspam or SA while installing iworx or at anytime.[/quote]
As an option during the install process might work
Select Spam Filtering software to install 1 SpamAssasin 2 dspam
But giving the option later would just confuse things and clutter the interface, I think.
I know in the past we’ve tried to stick with software written in internet technilogies like like php and perl but c is also a common language.
We’ll give your opinions all due consideration and thanks again for the feedback/suggestions? 
Yeah, I hope that InterWorx will add DSPAM. Also for DSPAM you must keep SpamAssassin.
I know a company that is using DSPAM and all customers are very statisfied with it.
Also when your email address is: dave@mydomain.com and you got a spam on that mail. Just forward that mail to: dave-spam@mydomain.com and it will me rejected the next time
I will wait when InterWorx will add DSPAM. 
I have a client using an exchange server and they get a lot of image / pdf spam with little or not content in the email. I believe this is going to get more common as time goes on so its good to know there is stuff out there to fight back.
I have a client using an exchange server and they get a lot of image / pdf spam with little or not content in the email. I believe this is going to get more common as time goes on so its good to know there is stuff out there to fight back.
So, you say dspam could help with image spams?
[quote=tiger;14860]So, you say dspam could help with image spams?[/quote]I guess not only with image spams. DSPAM works much better then SpamAssassin. You must configure SpamAssassin with DSPAM. Then you can forward spam mail to yourusername-spam@yourdomain.com and the next time it will be deleted.
And there is a webinterface off DSPAM what you can install if you want. Take a look on there site, I think there are more people that like DSPAM.
Example: Take a look on DirectAdmin forum, you can find much things about DSPAM. Also check the screenshots here
I’d also like this feature implemented in the next version of Iworx. 
“University of Michigan - Ann Arbor” is using DSPAM ( http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/sponsors.shtml ). Probably (IWorx-)Chris doesn’t like it?
[quote=Poooh;14873]I’d also like this feature implemented in the next version of Iworx. ;)[/quote]Me 2, its very usefull.
I searched on Google… and I found a nice thread about DSPAM with QMAIL.
When I have more time, I will try to install DSPAM with QMAIL, after the installation I will let you know if it works great, and if the installation is easy or not.
When you click here you can read the thread
Also I found this thread about a PHP controlpanel for DSPAM